In terms of the economics of proofreading, it can be said that it is not at all cost effective. The reason being volume or unpredictable workflow that prevents proofreaders from managing time. It can be said that large volumes of works do not allow finishing works in a hurry. It also means that volumes and deadlines are strictly managed within this job.
Oftentimes, proofreading is required to be finished within a short period of time. This can be assumed as quite demanding as identifying errors along with offering views on why they are termed as errors can be a demanding and time consuming task.
In many cases, proofreading is further fastened mainly because of the fact that further work may come anytime soon. This means that proofreaders are supposed to finish their work before the deadline in order to be prepared for further future works. This can be assumed as a demanding task. In a hurried environment, there is every possibility of quality being affected. This means that quality of work can be compromised by proofreaders when the pressure is high. This again is not ideal for readers as the quality suffers in the end. Once the quality falls below the expectations, there is every possibility of readers being affected in terms of reading the content (Kirton and Macmillan, 2007).
This can be considered as a negative situation and focus should be on quality of work rather than the quantity. There are also issues with the use of technology considering the fact that printing of papers requires papers and ink and when the quantity and volume is high, there is considerable wastage of paper and ink. In cases of reprints, there is also an increase in the cost of production and overtime cost. In case of works being delivered late, there is every possibility of losing the tasks and opportunities and thus affecting the revenue scales.
In such cases, it can be said that proofreading needs to be made a systematic process where the focus should be on enhancing the quality of content. There should be clarity on deadlines and quantity of works should not affect the quality of work. Only this situation will help in adding value to the proofreading framework. Thus, it can be said that the economics of proofreading is quite critical highlighting the fact that there needs to be great deal of balance between the quality and quantity. This will only ensure that proofreaders are not burdened with the responsibility of fastened submission of work along with making sure that errors are rectified and work is qualified for the purpose of publishing and printing (Jackson, 2005).